Phenomenology

film 2 of 2

To the Wonder

Tweet Review by Dean Duncan Jun 16, 2015 @deanduncan63

Saw #TotheWonder. Phenomenological cinema. Malick has made a full, free-standing ½ movie, then left us to finish it …

… Rights of the reader! Or, a terrifying responsibility …

#TotheWonder. Plays/feels like adaptation of/meditation on Wordsworth’s Ode: Intimations of Immortality! …

… “There was a time when meadow, grove, and stream/The earth, and every common sight/To me did seem/Apparell’d in celestial light …”

… Some nerve! I would like to add that he actually pulls it off.

#TotheWonder. That cut from the incoming French tide to that American expanse is as luminous as the homecoming in Murnau’s City Girl …

… The cutting is rhymed & conceptual, like Eisenstein. The imagery—insular, elusive, God-eyed—is practically Tarksovskian …

… In terms of precedent or echoes, that’s pretty exalted company. Or, fair to say, pretentious company …

… In other words, there are reasons that people have hated this. But wouldn’t we all be grateful …

… if we could just have a couple of Murnaus, Eisensteins, Tarkovskys? Maybe we should just be grateful he’s making films again!

#TotheWonder. Affleck looks as discomfited as S. Penn did in The Tree of Life. Except that S. Penn hardly had to be in The Tree of Life.

#TotheWonder. Each image is as creation’s-morn vivid and startling as a Lumiére film. The characters, echoing Bergman ’62, or the Snopes family, …

… seem to have a hard time appreciating it all. It’s as per usual w’ Malick. Eden, and after.